T14 In Ukraine - For the first time, the loss of Russia's most advanced operational tank has been confirmed. This was another blow to destroy the image of the Russian army.
The war in Ukraine was a major embarrassment for the Kremlin. Since the sinking of the Slava Moskva-class cruiser in April, the capture of the notorious 40-mile Russian convoy seen during the skirmish near Kyiv. In terms of the competent display of military power, Moscow has almost no morals. The latest attack is based on evidence that the Russian T-90M Proryv-3 (Прорыв-3), a modern and rare main battle tank, was destroyed on the battlefield by Ukrainian forces.
T14 In Ukraine
Ilya Ponomarenko, Defense Journalist This May 4 photo shows the remains of a T-90M tank still burning after a direct hit somewhere in the Kharkov administrative region, northeast of Kharkov.
Why Russia's New Armata Tank Is Missing From Ukraine
The news of the first T-90M tank destroyed in Ukraine should boost the morale of the Ukrainian armed forces. Due to its status as the most technological and capable tank in Russia's front-line military arsenal, the initial production batch of the T-90M tank was released to the 2nd M.I. Kalinin Taman motorized rifle regiment of the 1st Guards Tank Army only in the spring of 2020, according to the latest estimates, only 100 examples . Currently there are one or more of them. Very interesting T-14 Armata main tank. but not yet proven Not yet ready for battle in Maidan
Insufficient supply. Mainly due to the financial conditions of the production of new tanks and the development of the promised performance. Therefore, the T-90M made by Uralvagonzavod. It is a significant improvement over the T-90 line, which was first introduced in the early 1990s as a direct product of the T-72, an export-oriented version of the T-90C introduced in 2011.
The destruction of the tanks showed Moscow's readiness to deliver high-quality equipment in battle. This happened during the concentration of Russian forces in eastern Ukraine. The first evidence began to emerge in April that Russia might supply some limited T-90M tanks to the conflict as it seeks to maintain control of the eastern Donbass region. Video evidence released by Russia's National Guard (Rosgvardia) on April 25 has since gone viral on social media. T-90M tank hidden in Kharkiv region will be discovered.
The loss of one of the prized T-90Ms is certainly disappointing, given that the Russian army had to deal with other issues with its tank arsenal during the conflict. especially older Soviet-era tanks, including the T-72 and T-80, were widely used in the attack. The main guns of the damaged tank are stored in the hull. This often results in the turret becoming severely detached from the rest of the hull. If you run out of ammo during an attack
Poland Confirms It Has Sent Tanks To Ukraine
Equipped with an improved 2A46M-4 125 mm smoothbore main gun in a modernized turret, the T-90M is armed with improved armor protection and countermeasures. Relikt built-in Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA) for protection against shaped charges. and reducing the impact of armor-piercing cruise missiles (APFSDS).
In addition, the tank has mesh armor. and can also be equipped with mesh armor. both of which are designed to improve defense against rocket bombs. Its countermeasures include smoke launchers. which helps to cover it Including from infantry armed with anti-tank weapons. Significant sensor and fire control improvements are a key part of the T-90M's upgrades, as are improved long-range weapon stations. Tank Environment and Engine System including Ammunition Management System All upgrades are also available. These upgrades did not seem to help the T-90M, which was the first confirmed type of loss.
For whatever reason, the T-90M does not seem to have been used in conflicts until recently. Photos of Russia's most modern operational tanks. Destroyed on Ukrainian soil and therefore unfit for the Russian army, the formidable fighting force has fallen to a level few could have imagined in the last two and a half months. Discontinuation of the T-14 main battle tank (MBT) as a capable piece of equipment, citing its high cost. Banning widespread installation is dangerous. My "Is the T-14 a Game Changer?" My previous article did not attempt a detailed comparison of how the T-14 outperforms current NATO tanks. It's not trying to advertise the T-14 as a modern Tiger1. This article is not an assessment of NATO or Russian doctrine. Rather, he explains how the T-14 represents technical progress in NATO's backward armored warfare. Much of the criticism of this article stems from the conclusion that the lack of reliable data and statistics on the cost and number of T-14s in Russian service makes the purpose of this article fear mongering and misinformation. Costs and factors of production are good. But not in the scope of the article. But the point is to show an example of how NATO is failing those who want to innovate. Regardless of whether innovations like the T-14 are widely accepted or not. This attitude was not limited only to T-14. It can be applied to the Armored Fighting Vehicle (AFV) as a whole, as noted by Alaric Searle in his 2017 paper.
Despite the rise of helicopters and ATGMs, the future of tanks and armored personnel carriers as the most important weapon systems in ground warfare is not in jeopardy. The use of heavy weapons in the fighting in eastern Ukraine since 2014 is just one example of the use of mechanized units in Europe 2.
Guerre En Ukraine
Arguing that, Searle continued, “No army can rely on a vast and expanding infantry. Armor remains a key element in their military structure3. This can be further supported by the use of AFVs in Syria and Iraq. Give examples of how innovations such as modifications and special vehicles can be valuable to armies with limited manpower.4
Price is one of the main arguments against large-scale deployment of T-14. The main problem with this argument is that T-14 is undervalued beyond its utility. The program may never become a full-fledged kernel. Russian military. In July, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov said that the $4 million unit cost was high enough to force the Russian military to consider mass production of the new tank. instead saying that focusing on the T-72B3 project would be warranted in the long run. NATO Tank Alternative 5 This seems like an example of an ambitious military program that was canceled due to economic factors. Lessons can be learned from the T-146 project. Basically, the T-14 project represented a resurgence of Russian armored innovation, which had stagnated since then. The economic fallout of the Cold War
Tom J. Meyer highlights the West's lack of decision-making in post-Gulf War weapons innovation. Meyer's article on the development of active defense systems and the development of the Russian "Arena" APS describes a trend identified by the West. But unlike the Israeli Arena or Trophy systems, none of them are available at 7 stages of development, as the survey article points out.
T-14 may not be used in large quantities. But volume should not be an indicator of success. The quality and innovation of AFVs will determine their success. German Tigers were never fielded in sufficient numbers to compete with Shermans. But it provided the Allies with a tactical advantage that would not be matched until the later years of the war. Including members of NATO and Russia, Searle rightly states that manpower is the limiting factor in modern warfare. AFVs must be developed and reinvented to ensure crew and passenger safety8. This ensures that innovations like the T-14 will expand as new technologies and counter-threats emerge. spear etc. Use systems like APS to neutralize threats Use drone turrets to protect crew and reduce attrition. Ensure that the weapons and FCS crew are capable of effectively dealing with all types of AFV and infantry threats.
Russia To Receive Advanced Armata Tanks In 2022
For example, the post-Soviet experience in Chechnya shows this stagnation. Compared to the experience of Western tanks in the Persian Gulf War. Russian tanks stationed in Chechnya were badly damaged. In an article published in 2001
Adam Geibel identified the main factors in the loss of Russian tanks during the Second Chechen War (August 1999 - April 2000), including mechanical insecurity,
It companies in ukraine, singles in ukraine, dating sites in ukraine, flower delivery in ukraine, flowers in ukraine, single women in ukraine, animals in ukraine, dating women in ukraine, meet women in ukraine, hunger in ukraine, ukraine dating in usa, ukraine women in usa
0 Comments